Ross,
E. Wayne. (2001). The Social Studies Curriculum: Purposes, Problems,
and Possibilities (Rev. Ed.). Albany: State University of New York
Press.
Reviewed
by Gloria T. Alter
Visiting
Scholar (2001-2002), Harvard University Graduate School of Education; Associate
Professor, Dept. of Teaching and Learning, Northern Illinois University "To Understand
and Transform the World," A Review of The
Social Studies Curriculum The
Curriculum Challenge The
Social Studies Curriculum
informs and inspires social studies teachers and other educators to improve
practice by questioning our assumptions and challenging curricular content
and policies which limit and distort reality and possibility. This work
reflects perhaps the most important development in the field of social
studies--that of examining controversial curricular issues related to democracy
and society in a serious way and embracing them as essential, even central,
to the field. Possibilities
for Teaching and Learning The
framework of the book, within which a wide range of topics are addressed,
is provided in E. Wayne Ross's introduction and first and last chapters.
Readers are initially oriented to a particular understanding of several
key concepts: a) the conception of curriculum as student experience, not
only formal content, b) the role of teachers as curriculum developers,
not mere implementers of the curriculum, and c) the goal of social education
as "helping children and young adults to learn to understand and transform
their world," not simply to amass a body of information. A
major goal of the book is to "enable teachers and other curriculum workers
to better understand and act on the nature, scope, and context of the social
studies curriculum concerns in today's schools." Chapters address issues
which engage citizens and communities with the politics of curriculum and
instruction, as recurrent themes connect the chapters. The
first section of the book focuses on the "big picture" of social studies
including curricular debates in historical perspective, the role of history
in social studies, and citizenship education as it relates to oppression.
In the first chapter, E. Wayne Ross expands the usual history of social
studies to include "alternative roots" of the field. These alternative
sources and current literature on the topic are especially strong. An analysis
of frameworks for understanding the goals of social studies is also highly
reflective and carefully prepared. Grassroots movements and the voices
of teachers who support inquiry and social criticism find a place in this
review. Critical educational limitations related to the control of the
curriculum by the states and textbook publishers are raised here as well. Michael
Whelan addresses the role of history in the social studies curriculum--its
natural ability to meaningfully integrate disciplines, its character as
essentially interpretive activity, and its nature as an intriguing relationship
between the past and a continually evolving present. Cautions are given--that
history can be distorted when one's experience to interpret it is insufficient,
and knowledge can be acquired for its own sake, or worse still, for domination
and oppression. Instructional guidelines are also clearly articulated.
This engaging work should spark an interest in the substantive and meaningful
learning of history. Kevin
Vinson writes an inspiring and hopeful chapter envisioning citizenship
education as a force for opposing oppression. A careful analysis of the
social studies and civics standards (including Civitas) reveals that they
fail to adequately address the issue of oppression or fully develop a vision
for education opposing it. Contemporary critical bodies of literature,
examples of structurally oppressive conditions, and Iris Young's "faces
of oppression" (exploitation, marginalization, powerlessness, cultural
imperialism, and violence) are utilized in this chapter to explore new
possibilities for citizenship education. The
second section addresses social issues with special attention to diversity
and inclusion in the context of community. Sandra Mathison with Ross and
Vinson critique standards-based educational reform, focusing on stated
goals and underlying agendas. They analyze the ways in which conservative
and liberal concerns about this issue converge and diverge, and address
the misuse of testing and limits that are well-known to measurement and
evaluation experts. This material is much needed for community members
and parents as well as teachers, given the often misleading presentation
of the merits of high-stakes testing. The chapter exposes the reality of
who it is that benefits from these practices and at what expense. Rich
Gibson and J. Michael Peterson address whole schooling and reform with
reference to the Rouge Forum. Recent reform efforts in Michigan and Wisconsin
and a whole schooling research project are discussed. Reform results and
principles upon which the projects were based are included. The work provides
an empowering example of the personal, public, and political intersections
of educational practice. David
Hursh (multicultural social studies), Jack Nelson and Valerie Pang (racism),
Nel Noddings (feminism), and Jane Bernard-Powers (gender) integrate a multitude
of excellent insights with practical guidelines. "A central goal of multicultural
social studies" identified by Hursh--"to enable students to analyze cultural,
political, economic and historical patterns and structures so that students
will not only better understand society but also affect it" extends throughout
the subsequent works. "Not only race and diversity but gender and class"
are central here. Students can learn to see themselves as racialized, classed,
and gendered and can examine the worlds of the oppressor and the oppressed
through their various identities and in the context of structures of power.
They can question and change reality. Further,
content should be more accurately addressed and appropriately contextualized.
Multiple interpretations of diverse histories and student realities can
empower learners to be more than passive recipients of information. The
hypocrisy of the American credo in light of American experience needs to
be faced both in society and in the curriculum (Nelson and Pang). Nelson
and Pang suggest how history, science, literature and the arts as well
as the social sciences can more effectively address racism. They analyze
the very problematic construction of "race" and the roles of teachers,
professional organizations, and the social studies field itself as well
as textbooks in perpetuating racism. Noddings'
writing assesses the state of integration of feminism with social studies
education. Although women are seen more frequently in social studies, this
does not mean that women's perspectives and realities are being articulated
or discussed with students. The need remains for a feminist culture to
become a presence in the curriculum. Many substantive ideas are discussed
in a way that suggests possibilities for fascinating learning about women
and women's concerns. Jane
Bernard-Powers reviews gender equity concerns in historical perspective
with an assessment of future needs. The gender-biased social sciences and
social studies still leave fundamental assumptions unquestioned. Outside
of the classroom, bias and gender coding still prevail, and appropriate
attitudes and behaviors toward females is needed. Role modeling, personal
contacts, and the use of biography/autobiography are noted as tools for
learning. Yet, natural opportunities for questioning traditional practices
are often silenced. The
third section focuses on instruction and "an issues-centered curriculum."
Topics complement those in the second section: assessment with the work
on standards and testing, decolonizing the mind and culturally relevant
teaching with multicultural social studies and subsequent chapters, and
science and the arts with themes previously introduced. Sandra
Mathison explains assessment concepts in the context of technical, practical,
curricular/educational, and political problems. Gloria Ladson-Billings
describes culturally relevant teaching as that which "empowers students
to critically analyze the society in which they live and to work for social
change." Attention is given to the concepts of self and others, social
relations, and knowledge. Examples of teaching reveal that knowledge is
viewed critically and in continual creation, teachers are passionate about
their subject, they attend to prerequisite knowledge or skill needs, and
recognize the diverse nature of excellence. Terrie
Epstein presents art as an intellectual process and type of knowledge uniquely
useful in social studies. An engaging arts-based curriculum is discussed
which allows for a variety of forms to represent historical knowledge and
to be employed in constructing knowledge. Stephen Fleury's in-depth discussion
of science analyzes the creation and use of knowledge especially as it
relates to social studies and as political contexts influence their practice
historically and currently. Fleury calls for "a more emancipatory form
of social knowledge in social studies" and for problem-posing and critical-constructivist
pedagogical approaches to citizenship development. Ronald
Evans notes the political challenges to an issues-centered approach to
social studies, reiterating battles over whose knowledge (disciplines)
and practices (cultural transmission versus social criticism) are of most
worth. Interdisciplinary approaches support the types of social inquiry
necessary to fulfill the goal of understanding and transforming the world,
as "inquiry into any real world matter related to citizenship is naturally
holistic" (Evans). Real
world perspectives are inescapably global, as well. Merry Merryfield and
Binaya Subedi present strategies for the development of a true global citizenship
that confront nationalistic biases and colonialistic assumptions. The "interaction
of power, culture, and knowledge construction" is revealed when students
are exposed to alternative explanations of reality, experience alternative
realities, and through this develop the ability to see multiple perspectives
and challenge unsupported assumptions. Overcoming
Curricular Problems The
Social Studies Curriculumhelps
to bring integrity to the field and develop it as a viable force for social
change. The concluding chapter by E. Wayne Ross examines the readings in
light of critical perspectives on democracy, democratic ideals, and democratic
education. This text should contribute to a more democratic social studies
teacher education, integrating social justice issues within the context
of the curriculum. |